Legal Opinion
State v. Barber
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 13, 1996No. 14735PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHennessy, J.
The defendant, Donald Barber, Jr., entered a conditional plea of nolo contendere1 to the charge of violating subdivisions (1) and (2) of General Statutes § 14-227a (a),2 the behavioral and per se subdivisions of the statute prohibiting the operation of a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol. The court accepted the plea, rendered a judgment of guilty and imposed sentence. The defendant claims that the trial court improperly denied (1) his motion to suppress his blood test results because the search warrant was not supported by probable cause and (2) his motion to *591suppress the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- State v. GeislerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. CoutureSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- State v. BartonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- State v. MarraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. JolySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Mata v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
- Garcia v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
- Clynch v. ChapmanDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2003
- State v. LongoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- State v. HoodConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.