Dumont v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STOUGHTON, J.
This is an appeal from the judgment dismissing the appeal by the plaintiff, Roland Dumont, from the decision of the commissioner of motor vehicles suspending Dumont’s license to operate a motor vehicle. Dumont claims that (1) there was no probable cause for his arrest, (2) the commissioner’s decision was not supported by substantial evidence, and his expert evidence rebutted the statutory presumption, (3) General Statutes §§ 14-227a (a)1 and 14-227b2 are *637unconstitutional in various respects, (4) his rights were substantially prejudiced because the hearing officer acted as…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. FrancoWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Burg v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Commonwealth v. MikulanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- State v. TannerOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Ecker v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Greif v. Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2000
- Simard v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Crandlemire v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Glanz v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
- Dumont v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.