County Court of Ulster Cty. v. Allen
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens
A New York statute provides that, with certain exceptions, the presence of a firearm in an automobile is presumptive evidence of its illegal possession by all persons then occupying the vehicle.1 The United States Court of Appeals for the *143Second Circuit held that respondents may challenge the constitutionality of this statute in a federal habeas corpus proceeding and that the statute is “unconstitutional on its face.” 568 F. 2d 998, 1009. We granted certiorari to review these holdings and also to consider whether the statute is constitutional in its application to respondents. 439 U. S. 815.
Fo…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,875 opinions
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Engle v. IsaacSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Harris v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Caldwell v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
1,870 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.