United Iron Works v. Standard Brass Casting Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, J., pro tem.
Plaintiff sued to recover the purchase price of certain easting work as to which no dispute exists. By cross-complaint the defendant sought to recover alleged damages for improper performance of the contract. The case has been tried twice. At the first trial judgment went for defendant on its cross-complaint but was reversed by the district court of appeal (United Iron Works v. Standard Brass Casting Co., 69 Cal. App. 384 [231 Pac. 567]), a transfer of the case to the supreme court for hearing and decision being denied. On a retrial, submitted on the record of the first…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Miller v. Germain Seed & Plant Co.California Supreme Court · 1924
- Mannix v. TryonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Bancroft v. San Francisco Tool Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- United Iron Works v. Standard Brass Casting Co.California Court of Appeal · 1924
- Roebling Construction Co. v. Doe Estate Co.California Court of Appeal · 1917
3Cited by6 opinions
- Nelson v. SpenceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Wheeler v. OppenheimerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Artukovich v. Pacific States Cast Iron Pipe Co.California Court of Appeal · 1947
- Clayton v. SchultzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Wells v. LloydCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.