Bancroft v. San Francisco Tool Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and. County of San Francisco, denying a new trial. Charles W. Slack, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.
Plaintiff brings this action to recover damages arising from a defective elevator furnished him by defendant. He was nonsuited, and now appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial. It is claimed on his part that the contract under which the elevator was sold and delivered was a written contract. This contention is denied, but, owing to the views we entertain upon other questions involved in the litigation, we leave the issue open, a decision of it not being necessary to the final disposition of the case.
The elevator furnished plaintiff by defendant was not suitable for the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rice v. ForsythCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875
- Mason v. ChappellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1860
- Robert W. L. Rasin & Co. v. ConleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1882
- Walker v. PueCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1881
3Cited by24 opinions
- MacKnight Flintic Stone Co. v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- United Iron Works v. Outer Harbor Dock & Wharf Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
- Remsberg v. Hackney Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
- Bryson v. McConeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Mannix v. TryonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.