Legal Opinion
Wheeler v. Oppenheimer
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 4, 1956No. Civ. 21515PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VALLÉE, J.
Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of dismissal entered on an order sustaining a demurrer to the second amended complaint with leave to amend. Plaintiff declined to amend. Plaintiff also appeals from the order sustaining the demurrer and the order for dismissal after he failed to amend. These orders are nonappealable and the appeals therefrom will be dismissed. (Berri v. Superior Court, 43 Cal.2d 856, 860 [279 P.2d 8].)
The second amended complaint alleges: Plaintiff is a licensed building contractor. Bella Heller, now deceased, was a resident of the county of Los Angeles. Prior to…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Faulkner v. California Toll Bridge AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Berri v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Gardner v. Rich Manufacturing Co., Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1945
- Vallindras v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Pierce v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Farnham v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Semole v. SansoucieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Smith v. Kern County Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
- Markborough California, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Bunch v. Artec International Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.