Legal Opinion
Artukovich v. Pacific States Cast Iron Pipe Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 5, 1947No. Civ. 15663PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
Prom a judgment in favor of defendant after trial before the court without a jury in an action to recover consequential damages for an alleged breach of contract, plaintiffs appeal.
The evidence being viewed in the light most favorable to defendant (respondent) and pursuant to the rules set forth in Estate of Isenberg, 63 Cal.App.2d 214, 216 et seq. [146 P.2d 424], the essential facts are:
On May 29, 1944, defendant entered into a contract to sell plaintiffs a certain quantity of cast iron pipe. After the pipe was delivered to plaintiffs they instituted the present suit seeking to recover…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kennedy v. IsenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Inner Shoe Tire Co. v. TondroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Bandy v. WestoverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- United Iron Works v. Standard Brass Casting Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929
- Dickson v. CondeIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Canaras v. Lift Truck Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Fram Corp. v. DavisSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
- Nelson v. SpenceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Wheeler v. OppenheimerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Hotel Longview, Inc. v. PittmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.