Legal Opinion
Clayton v. Schultz
California Supreme Court
Decided July 28, 1941No. S. F. 16168PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This appeal is from a judgment rendered against Phineas D. Clayton which, among other things, directed him to pay to the defendants the sum of $1,633 58 as a result of accounting proceedings had in connection with a quiet title action brought by A. D. Clayton in 1932, in which Phineas D. Clayton (hereinafter referred to as plaintiff) had intervened, claiming ownership of the real property involved by virtue of a delinquent tax sale and the subsequent acquisition of the interests of A. D. Clayton, the purchaser thereunder. The rights of the latter are not involved herein.
In the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Estate of BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Wadleigh v. PhelpsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Central Savings Bank of Oakland v. LakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Raynor v. DrewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Erlin v. National Union Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Steelduct Co. v. Henger-Seltzer Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- System Investment Corp. v. Union BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Allen v. Cal. Mut. Bldg & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Wilcox v. WesterheideSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- Herbert v. CassinelliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.