Legal Opinion

Mannix v. Tryon

California Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1907No. Sac. No. 1507PublishedCited by 26 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.

This is an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. The defendant Tryon, owner of a lot in the city of Sacramento, contracted with the defendant Harris to erect a three-story building according to certain plans and specifications. The plaintiff, as a subcontractor, entered into a contract with the original contractor, Harris, to do the plastering and hard-finish work according to said specifications, and claiming to have performed it, and that a balance of one hundred and seventy-eight dollars was due him therefor, filed a lien and commenced this action against the original contractor and the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. MacKnight Flintic Stone Co. v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. Builders' Supply Depot v. O'ConnorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. FisherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Becker v. Superior Court of Santa Clara Cty.California Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Bancroft v. San Francisco Tool Co.California Supreme Court · 1898

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Corp. of Presiding Bishop of Church of Jesus Christ of Latterday Saints v. CavanaughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Quist v. SandmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Engebretson v. GayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Mills v. OlsenMontana Supreme Court · 1911
  5. McDonald v. FiliceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API