Legal Opinion
Flores v. Arizona
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided January 24, 2000No. 92-596-TUC-ACMPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
MARQUEZ, Senior District Judge.
August 20, 1992, Plaintiffs filed this action seeking declaratory relief against the Defendants for failing to provide limited English proficient (LEP) children with a program of instruction calculated to make them proficient in speaking, understanding, reading, and writing English, while enabling them to master the standard aca demic curriculum as required of all students. See Lau v. Nichols, 414 U.S. 563, 94 S.Ct. 786, 39 L.Ed.2d 1 (1974) (failure to provide English instruction to students of Chinese decent who do not…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & TrustSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Lau v. NicholsSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- William Rose, Jr. Orie Reed v. Wells Fargo & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Castaneda v. PickardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Roosevelt Elementary School District Number 66 v. BishopArizona Supreme Court · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Horne v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Flores Ex Rel. Flores v. ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Flores v. ArizonaDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2007
- Flores v. ArizonaDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2005
- Miriam Flores v. John HuppenthalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.