Legal Opinion

Flores v. Arizona

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided December 15, 2005No. CV92-596TUC-RCCPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER “WO”

COLLINS, District Judge.

On October 31, 2005, the Court took under advisement a request made by Plaintiffs for sanctions due to the State of Arizona’s failure to take action to comply with the Court Order (Docket No. 296), that found that English Language Learners (“ELL”) programs must be funded in a manner that is not arbitrary and capricious. Also, the Court took under advisement the following motions: Defendant’s Opposition to Motion for Sanctions and Request for Accelerated Determination Re: Consideration of Federal Funds (Docket No. 303), and the Opposition of ACEC and AGC to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Anderson v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  3. Lau v. NicholsSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Spallone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. In Re Dual-Deck Video Cassette Recorder Antitrust Litigation. Go-Video, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Horne v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Flores Ex Rel. Flores v. ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. Democratic Nat'l Comm. v. ReaganDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2018
  4. Horne v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Flores v. HorneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API