Legal Opinion
Flores Ex Rel. Flores v. Arizona
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 22, 2008No. 07-15603, 07-15605PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BERZON, Circuit Judge:
On January 24, 2000, the District Court for the District of Arizona ruled that Arizona was violating the Equal Educational Opportunity Act of 1974, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1701 et seq. (“EEOA”), because the state’s funding for English language instruction for non-native speakers was “not reasonably calculated to effectively implement the ... educational theory which” the state had approved. Flores v. Arizona, 172 F.Supp.2d 1225, 1239 (“Flores II ”) (D.Ariz.2000). Eight years later, Arizona has still not satisfied the terms of that judgment, nor complied with the bulk of the…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Agostini v. FeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Horne v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Phelps v. AlameidaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Nyle Hooper v. Lockheed Martin CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- County of Santa Clara v. Astra USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Dewhurst v. Century Aluminum Co.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2010
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.