Legal Opinion
Connor v. Jackson
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 4, 1949No. Civ. No. 17203PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
Recovery for alleged injuries by an automobile having been denied, appellant now demands a reversal of the judgment by reason of (1) the court’s denial of his motion for a continuance, (2) its exclusion of a writing by respondent Jackson purporting to admit his liability, and (3) rulings improperly excluding “material portions of evidence.”
About 3 p. m., April 13, 1947, Timothy Connor (18 months of age) accompanied his father to the service station of Van and Bill in Los Angeles County and while there the infant received serious bodily injuries. On May 29, 1947, acting through his guardian ad…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McPhee v. LavinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Sheldon v. LandwehrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Beckman v. WatersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- King v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Maberto v. WolfeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gittens v. LundbergUtah Supreme Court · 1955
- Edgar v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- Swick v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Johnson v. FassettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955