Legal Opinion
Maberto v. Wolfe
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 4, 1930No. Docket No. 7074PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, J., pro tem.
On February 22, 1927, Benedetta Maberto (who will hereafter be referred to as respondent) was struck and injured by an automobile owned by appellant Dees and driven by defendant Wolfe. Respondent at the time she was struck was standing within the legally established safety zone on Market Street just west of Powell Street, in the city of San Francisco. She was knocked unconscious and sustained a fracture of the fingers of her left hand and other injuries. No complaint being made that the award of damages is excessive we will not refer further to her injuries.
There is but…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Estate of CasparCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Maupin v. SolomonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Randolph v. HuntCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- McWhirter v. FullerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Grantham v. OrdwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Edwards v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Souza v. CortiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Norris v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
- Galarowicz v. WARDUtah Supreme Court · 1951
- Roberts v. Ford Aerospace and Communications Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1990
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.