Legal Opinion

Edgar v. Garrett

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 26, 1969No. 2 CA-CIV 678PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOLLOY, Chief Judge.

These extraordinary writ proceedings challenge the trial court’s jurisdiction in ordering that a case be replaced on the active calendar. Being of the opinion that the jurisdictional attack was meritorious, we granted certiorari. Although an order vacating an order of dismissal is appealable, Young Mines Co., Ltd. v. Blackburn, 22 Ariz. 199, 196 P. 167 (1921), see also Arnold v. Van Ornum, 4 Ariz. App. 89, 417 P.2d 723 (1966), the unusual posture of this case justified prompt appellate intervention.

The procedural chronology is as follows. In July, 1963, a complaint was…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of MillimanArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  2. In Re the Trust Under the Last Will & Testament of JacksonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
  3. Avery v. Associated Seed Growers, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Meloy v. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1951
  5. State ex rel. Enderlin State Bank v. RoseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lewis v. N.J. Riebe Enterprises, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Garza v. Swift Transportation Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Esplendido Apartments v. OlssonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  4. In re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-5860Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  5. Tucson Electric Power Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API