Legal Opinion
In Re the Estate of Kinney
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 14, 2007No. A05-1794PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILDEA, Justice.
James H. Kinney (James), as personal representative of the estate of Howard C. Kinney (Howard), appeals from the district court’s order on summary judgment that the antenuptial agreement between decedent Howard and Lillian Kinney (Lillian) is invalid. James argues that the court incorrectly concluded that an “opportunity to consult with independent counsel” requirement exists under common law, and the court therefore erred when it invalidated the antenuptial agreement. The court of appeals affirmed. In re Estate of Kinney, No. A05-1794, 2006 WL 1806386 (Minn.App. July…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Malchow v. MalchowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Estate of Serbus v. SerbusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Gartner v. GartnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Isles Wellness, Inc. v. Progressive Northern Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- Slingerland v. SlingerlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- City of Morris v. Sax Investments, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- Toomey v. DahlDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- C.O. v. DoeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- Ware v. WareWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2009
- Kremer v. KremerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.