Isles Wellness, Inc. v. Progressive Northern Insurance Co.

OPINION

BLATZ, Chief Justice.

The issue in this case is whether the lay ownership of respondents — three clinics1 providing chiropractic, physical therapy, and massage therapy services (collectively “clinics”) — violated the corporate practice of medicine doctrine by providing health care services to patients. The court of appeals held that the corporate employment of chiropractic, physical therapy, and massage therapy practitioners is not prohibited. We affirm in part, and reverse and remand in part, holding that the corporate practice of medicine doctrine applies to the practice of…