Legal Opinion

Kremer v. Kremer

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 30, 2018No. A15-2006PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LILLEHAUG, Justice.

*620Appellant Robbie Michael Kremer appeals from a district court order invalidating an antenuptial agreement he entered into with his then-fiancée, respondent Michelle Beth Kremer.1 The antenuptial agreement contained provisions concerning the disposition of both marital and nonmarital property upon dissolution or death. The district court held that, under Minn. Stat. § 519.11 (2016), the agreement was procedurally unfair because Michelle did not have an adequate opportunity to consult with an attorney. The court of appeals affirmed-holding that the agreement was procedurally…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  2. American Tower, L.P. v. City of GrantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  3. Van Asperen v. Darling Olds, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  4. Quade v. Secura InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  5. Brayton v. PawlentySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Depositors Ins. Co. v. DollanskySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
  2. Core and Main, LP v. Ron McCabeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2023
  3. Phone Recovery Servs., LLC v. Qwest Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
  4. Arp Wave, LLC v. SalpeterDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2019
  5. Charles Aldean v. City of WoodburyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API