Gartner v. Gartner
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Matson, Justice.
Appeal from an order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.
Plaintiff and defendant were married on June 5, 1948. Just prior to their marriage they entered into an antenuptial agreement, dated May 26,1948, which purported to adjust their property rights upon their forthcoming marriage.
Plaintiff, on May 7, 1953, brought this action to have the ante-nuptial contract declared null and void on the grounds that: (1) It was contrary to public policy; (2) its terms are inadequate and unconscionable; (3) plaintiff did not understand its effect when she signed it; (4) defendant’s…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Appleby v. Estates of ApplebySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Fritz v. FritzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Malchow v. MalchowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Karger v. WangerinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Slingerland v. SlingerlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Metro Office Parks Co. v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Estate of Serbus v. SerbusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Theisen’s Inc. v. Red Owl Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Marriage of McKee-Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Christie v. EstateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.