Legal Opinion
Carroll v. Central Counties Gas Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 1, 1925No. Docket No. 2983PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.
The defendant’s demurrer to the complaint herein was sustained without leave to amend and judgment was thereupon entered in favor of defendant. Plaintiff has appealed from the judgment. The third and fourth paragraphs of the complaint read as follows:
“That at all times herein mentioned defendant was and still is engaged in the production and distribution of artificial gas for illuminating, heating and other purposes in the County of Tulare, State of California; that for the purpose of distributing said gas defendant at all times herein mentioned maintained and still maintains along and upon…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Merrill v. Los Angeles Gas Elec. Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Parkin v. Grayson-Owen Co.California Court of Appeal · 1914
- Fairbairn v. American River Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Marton v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Fairbairn v. American River Elec. Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Hoy v. TornichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- George v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Gibson v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Sawdey v. Producers' Milk Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
- American Automobile Insurance v. Transport Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.