Legal Opinion

Johnston v. Peairs

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 28, 1931No. Docket No. 477PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

This is an action by a pedestrian to recover for injuries claimed to have been received due to the collision of two automobiles, and to have been caused by the negligence of both drivers. The collision occurred at the corner of Third and Laurel Streets in the city of San Diego, just before noon on April 24, 1929. The plaintiff, a lady of the age of sixty-five years, had just left a hall some half block from the intersection in question, where she had been exercising. She was proceeding along the sidewalk and had just reached the street corner when an automobile jumped the curb and struck her…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fishman v. SilvaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. Crabbe v. RhoadesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Von Stetten v. Yellow-Checker Cab Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Burns v. Osborne-Fitzpatrick Finance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Zelayeta v. Pacific Greyhound Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1951
  2. State v. LingmanUtah Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Linde v. EmmickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Granone v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. Wells Truckways, Ltd. v. CebrianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API