Legal Opinion
Perez v. Crocker
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 25, 1927No. Docket No. 6012PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, J., pro tem.
In this action plaintiff sought to recover damages from defendants for personal injuries sustained by him as the result of defendants’ negligence.
The defendants Joseph Wilson and Claire Wilson, though testifying at the trial, made no appearance in the action and plaintiff did not ask for judgment against them.
The case was tried before a jury and a verdict returned against defendant Orman Crocker in the sum of seven thousand dollars. From the judgment entered on this verdict and from the court’s order denying his motion for a new trial the defendant Crocker prosecutes this…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Keena v. United Railroads of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Edwards v. EarnestSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Dameron v. AnsbroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- Shay v. HorrWashington Supreme Court · 1914
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hughes v. QuackenbushCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Hodge v. Weinstock, Lubin & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
- Crabbe v. RhoadesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Faris v. Burroughs Adding Machine Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1929
- Walter v. AyvazianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.