Legal Opinion
Thayer v. Brady
Washington Supreme Court
Decided August 21, 1947No. 30204PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
Brady Construction Company, a copartnership consisting of C. D. Brady and C. Ted Brady, had the general contract for a war housing project known as Stadium Site, which was being erected by the Federal public housing authority, hereinafter referred to as the housing authority. Consolidated Painters, likewise a copartnership, represented throughout the transactions herein referred to by Lester W. Thayer, had the painting subcontract, which provided that Consolidated Painters would
“. . . furnish on the above named Project all labor, material, and complete all painting, all according to plans,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mitau v. RoddanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Wiebener v. PeoplesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Queen City Construction Co. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Floyd v. Ring Const. Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1946
- Continental Insurance Company v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mercer Place Condominium Ass'n v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- Arden Engineering Co. v. E. Turgeon Construction Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1964
- Henry v. LindWashington Supreme Court · 1969
- Toulouse v. New York Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1952
- Fancher v. LandrethWashington Supreme Court · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.