Legal Opinion

Wiebener v. Peoples

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided August 25, 1914No. 3116PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Error from County Court, Woods County; Action by J. E. Peoples against 'John -Wiebener and another for balance claimed on building contract." Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

THACKER, C.

Plaintiffs in error will be designated as “defendants” and defendant in. error as “plaintiff,” in accord with their respective titles in the trial court.

Plaintiff, as contractor and builder, sues defendants, as owners of the property, for $869.80, with interest, thereon at the rate of 6 per cent, per annum from January 13, 1910, until paid, as a balance owing for the construction of a business building at Alva, Okla., under a written contract which required defendants to pay therefor $8,917.00 plus proper charges for “extras,” which plaintiff alleges amounted to $162.80.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cooper v. Ft. Smith & W. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Elliott v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  3. Foeller v. HeintzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Burke v. CoyneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  5. Puls v. CaseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Strange v. HicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Davis v. Keeche Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. McDowell v. DrozSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. Kelley v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  5. Rosen v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API