Legal Opinion

Toulouse v. New York Life Insurance

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1952No. 31771PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

This appeal presents a challenge to the validity of an agreement between an insurer and an insured, where the insured, exercising one of the optional methods of settlement offered by an endowment policy on maturity of the policy, elected to leave the proceeds of the policy with the insurer, subject to withdrawal on demand, any amount remaining in the insured’s possession at the insured’s death to be distributed to designated third parties.

In this case the executor of the insured’s estate contends that the portion of the agreement which relates to distribution to the designated third parties…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. DutcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Decker v. FowlerWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  3. State Ex Rel. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. BlandSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945
  4. Estate of HoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. In Re the Estate of KossSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1930

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. TL James & Co., Inc. v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
  2. Mall Tool Co. v. Far West Equipment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Mercer Place Condominium Ass'n v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  4. In Re Madsen's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Mollett v. United Benefit Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1972

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API