Legal Opinion
Floyd v. Ring Const. Corp.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided June 1, 1946No. 1330PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOYCE, District Judge.
• This suit is on an employment contract. Defendant is a construction contractor. Plaintiff was one of its superintendents and had for many years worked as an estimator and superintendent of construction for defendant. His compensation was fixed by a contract executed June 3, 1941, at a stated salary plus a percentage of the net profits on construction work that he estimated and supervised. In 1942 defendant bid on and was awarded by the United States Government two construction contracts at Camp McCoy, Sparta, Wisconsin, on what was known as Areas C and E. There is a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wilmot v. Minneapolis Automobile Trade Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- City of South St. Paul v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Mueller v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- Hayday v. Hammermill Paper Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
3Cited by10 opinions
- Eastmount Construction Company and American Surety Company v. Transport Manufacturing & Equipment CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
- Stetson v. Investors Oil, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
- Floyd v. Ring Const. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948
- Kermit H. Severson, D/B/A Cardel Company v. Marcus FleckCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958
- Minnesota Amusement Company, a Corporation v. John Fred LarkinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.