Pacific Palisades Bowl Mobile Estates, LLC v. City of Los Angeles
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WERDEGAR, J.
We hold here that the requirements of the California Coastal Act of 1976 (Pub. Resources Code, § 30000 et seq.; hereafter Coastal Act) and the Mello Act (Gov. Code, §§ 65590, 65590.1) apply to a proposed conversion, within California’s coastal zone, of a mobilehome park from tenant occupancy to resident ownership. In so holding, we reject the argument that such a conversion is not a “development” for purposes of the Coastal Act, and further reject the argument that Government Code section 66427.5, a provision of the Subdivision Map Act (Gov. Code, §§ 66410-66499.37),…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Merrill v. Navegar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Mejia v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Horn v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Yost v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- People v. AriasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by106 opinions
- People v. ValenciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- Even Zohar Construction & Remodeling, Inc. v. Bellaire Townhouses, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- State Department of Public Health v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- Riverside County Sheriff's Department v. StiglitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- Connor v. First Student, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2018
101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.