Legal Opinion

Kaake v. Lott

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 26, 1967No. Civ. 31232PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.

Plaintiff was injured while riding a bicycle which was struck from the rear by an automobile operated by defendant. A jury having found in plaintiff’s favor, defendant successfully moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and, in the alternative, a new trial, contending that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict and that the court erred in instructing the jury on the doctrine of the last clear chance. The court’s decision was preliminarily reflected by a minute order which, as to the motion for new trial, recites that the same is granted because of the insufficiency of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brandelius v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Rodabaugh v. TekusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Sills v. Los Angeles Transit LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Bonebrake v. McCormickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Peterson v. BurkhalterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cobb v. University of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  2. Wechlo v. WinyardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  3. Forwood v. SuttonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Gerritsma v. VogelaarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Forwood v. SuttonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API