Forwood v. Sutton
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THOMPSON, J.
Appellant, the plaintiff in a personal injury action, has appealed from an adverse judgment entered after a jury verdict for the *345defendant (respondent). The sole issue raised by this appeal concerns the propriety of the action of the trial court in refusing a jury instruction tendered by appellant on the doctrine of last clear chance. The instruction as tendered is conceded to be a correct statement of the law. The only question presented is thus the existence of evidence in the record to support the giving of the instruction. In determining the presence or absence of that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brandelius v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Desherow v. RhodesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Fry v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Espinoza v. RossiniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Kaake v. LottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wechlo v. WinyardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Forwood v. SuttonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970