Legal Opinion

Royer v. Wendland

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1971PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBryson, J.

Plaintiff brought an action at law for damages against defendant, demanding general and punitive damages. Defendant filed a general denial, affirmatively pleaded self-defense, and counterclaimed, alleging that the plaintiff committed assault and battery upon the defendant. Plaintiff’s reply is a general denial. The jury returned a verdict against defendant and in favor of plaintiff for $1,500 general damages and $5,000 punitive damages. Defendant appeals.

The following, from the evidence, explains the incident. Plaintiff lives on a tract of land located three-tenths of a mile off Highway 219,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McGill v. Huling Buick CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Ginter v. HandyOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Scheufele v. NewmanOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Royer v. GaileyOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Eldred v. BurnsOregon Supreme Court · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Richmond v. Fields Chevrolet Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Sherrod v. HolzshuhOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Propp v. LongCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API