Legal Opinion

Scheufele v. Newman

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1949PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries resulting from an alleged assault and battery. In the complaint it is alleged, so far as material herein, that defendant wrongfully and maliciously struck the plaintiff on the shoulder, jaw and face with a heavy rifle, thereby causing a laceration to his lower jaw and lip, a fracture of an upper front tooth, and an injury to the nerves and soft tissue of the chin. Plaintiff also avers that on account of this attack, he has sustained a “permanent scarring and disfigurement.”

Defendant in his answer admitted that he struck plaintiff and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Penn v. HendersonOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  2. State v. TarterOregon Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Newcome v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  4. Buell Et Ux. v. Mathes Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Eldred v. BurnsOregon Supreme Court · 1947

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. PallanckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
  2. Person v. Children's Hospital National Medical CenterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. State v. David G. BuckleySupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
  4. Hendricks v. SanfordOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Bandy v. Norris, Beggs & SimpsonOregon Supreme Court · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API