Legal Opinion

Sherrod v. Holzshuh

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1976PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.

The complaint in this case joined a suit to rescind a contract for the purchase of a house with an action for damages under the Oregon Unlawful Trade Practices Act (ORS 646.605 et seq.) both based upon alleged misrepresentations by defendants, including both the sellers of the house and their real estate agent.

The case was tried before a jury. At the conclusion of the testimony the trial judge held that plaintiffs were entitled to a rescission of the transaction and then submitted to the jury plaintiffs’ claim for damages under the Act. The jury returned a verdict against defendants for $400…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Beglau v. AlbertusOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Holden v. PIONEER BROADCASTING CO.Oregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Scott v. Western International Surplus Sales, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Beecher v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Keegan v. LenzieOregon Supreme Court · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gabriel v. O'HARASupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Raudebaugh v. Action Pest Control, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  3. Wolverton v. StanwoodOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Stafford v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  5. Newton v. Family Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API