Propp v. Long
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLeeson, J.
In this negligence action, plaintiff appealed from a judgment for defendant. Defendant moved to dismiss the appeal, arguing, among other things, that it was not timely filed. We agreed, and dismissed plaintiffs appeal. Propp v. Long, 107 Or App 421, 812 P2d 27 (1991). On review, the Supreme Court determined that the appeal was timely filed, and remanded to us for a determination on the merits. Propp v. Long, 313 Or 218, 831 P2d 685 (1992).
We view the facts in the light most favorable to defendant, who prevailed on the jury verdict below. Brown v. J. C. Penney Co., 297 Or 695, 688 P2d 811…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Brown v. J. C. Penney Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. KesslerOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Bellikka v. GreenOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Woody v. WaibelOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Jenkins v. AAA Heating and Cooling, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1966
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- KMC Leasing, Inc. v. Rockwell-Standard Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- Pereira v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- Cryo-Tech, Inc. v. JKC Bend, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- Hammer v. Fred Meyer Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- Davis v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.