Legal Opinion

Royer v. Gailey

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1969PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMengler, J.

(Pro Tempore).

Plaintiffs appeal from portions of a decree which establishes: (1) the right of defendants Wendland to one-half of the water from a spring on land purchased by plaintiffs under a land sale contract from defendants Gailey; (2) the right of entry upon the land.by defendants Wendland to maintain the easement and rights granted them; (B) that the water rights granted to defendants Wendland by the state engineer are subject to the provisions of the decree and are appurtenant to the lands of .defendants Wendland and Gailey. Plaintiffs allege that the court erred in: (1) granting an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. Hoisting & Portable Engineers, Local Union No. 701Oregon Supreme Court · 1964
  2. POWERS ET UX. v. Coos Bay Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1953
  3. LUCKEY ET UX v. DeatsmanOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Shepard Et Ux. v. PurvineOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Cole v. FOGELOregon Supreme Court · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Adamson v. AdamsonOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Conklin v. Karban Rock, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  3. Wayt v. BuerkelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. Roadway Express, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Wilfred E. Jossy, William O. Jossy and Roberta TichenorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  5. Royer v. WendlandOregon Supreme Court · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API