Mission Springs Water District v. Verjil
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RICHLI, J.
Mission Springs Water District (the District) increased its water and sewer rates. Initiatives to roll back the increases gathered enough signatures to qualify for the ballot. Rather than hold an election on the initiatives, however, the District filed this action against the proponents of the initiatives (the Proponents) for a declaration that the initiatives are invalid.
The Proponents filed a “SLAPP motion”—i.e., a special motion to strike pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16 (SLAPP Act). For this motion to be granted, the Proponents had to show that the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Oasis West Realty v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- City of Cotati v. CashmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Flatley v. MauroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Robert L. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Newport Harbor Offices & Marina, LLC v. Evangelism, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Wilde v. City of DunsmuirCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
- Paradise Irrigation Dist. v. Comm'n on State Mandates, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- City of Morgan Hill v. Bushey, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Blakemore v. Bruce CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2021
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.