Legal Opinion

Robert L. v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 2003No. S100359PublishedCited by 211 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MORENO, J.

At the March 7, 2000 Primary Election, the California electorate passed Proposition 21, the Gang Violence and Juvenile Crime Prevention Act of 1998. Section 4 of Proposition 21 added Penal Code, section 186.22, subdivision (d) (section 186.22(d)),1 which provides that “[a]ny person who is convicted of a public offense punishable as a felony or a misdemeanor,” committed for the benefit of a criminal street gang, shall be punished by imprisonment in the county jail, or by imprisonment in the state prison for one, two, or three years. In this case, we decide two issues: (1)…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ewing v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Delaney v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. People v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Ginns v. SavageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Legislature v. EuCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by211 opinions

  1. Arias v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  2. People v. JuradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  3. People v. ValenciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  4. People v. BenavidesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  5. People v. ParkCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013

206 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API