Legal Opinion

Oasis West Realty v. Goldman

California Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 2011No. S181781PublishedCited by 537 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BAXTER, J.

In 2004, defendant Attorney Kenneth A. Goldman agreed to represent plaintiff Oasis West Realty, LLC (Oasis), in its effort to obtain approval of a redevelopment project from the Beverly Hills City Council. Goldman terminated the representation about two years later. In 2008, Goldman became involved in a campaign to thwart the same redevelopment project by soliciting signatures on a referendum petition to overturn the Beverly Hills City Council’s approval of the project. Shortly after the voters upheld the city council’s approval by a very narrow margin, Oasis filed a…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Gentile v. State Bar of Nev.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. City of Cotati v. CashmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Soukup v. Law Offices of Herbert HafifCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by537 opinions

  1. Baral v. SchnittCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Perrin Davis v. Facebook, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  3. Prakashpalan v. Engstrom, Lipscomb & LackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. Monster Energy Company v. SchechterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Barry v. State Bar of Cal.California Supreme Court · 2017

532 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API