Legal Opinion

Paradise Irrigation Dist. v. Comm'n on State Mandates

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided March 20, 2019No. C081929PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHoch, J.

*771This appeal focuses on circumstances in which local water and irrigation districts may be entitled to subvention for unfunded state mandates. "Subvention" refers to claims by local governments and agencies in California for reimbursement from the state for costs of complying with state mandates for which the mandate does not concomitantly provide funds to the local agency. ( Connell v. Superior Court (1997) 59 Cal.App.4th 382, 395, 69 Cal.Rptr.2d 231 ( Connell ).) In the event a local agency believes it is entitled to subvention for a new unfunded state mandate, the agency may file a "test…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. DeVita v. County of NapaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. County of San Diego v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Rider v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. City of Sacramento v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cleveland Nat'l Forest Found. v. Cnty. of San Diego, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. Cleveland Nat. Forest Foundation v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
  3. Cleveland Nat. Forest Foundation v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
  4. Dept. of Finance v. Com. on State MandatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
  5. Dept. of Finance v. Commission on State MandatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API