Legal Opinion
Busch Jewelry Co. v. State Board of Optometry
Mississippi Supreme Court
Decided February 9, 1953No. 38670PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHale, J.
Appellee brought suit to enjoin Busch Jewelry Company and Dr. F. M. Dooley from unlawfully engaging in the practice of optometry. This appeal is from a decree granting the relief prayed for and the sole question presented is whether appellee has authority to bring such a suit in view of the fact that Dr. Dooley is a licensed medical doctor and not an optometrist.
Chapter 431, Laws of 1946, (Section 8923-51, Supplement to Code of 1942) provides that “An action for any injunction may be brought and maintained in the name of any state board authorized to hold examinations and grant license to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ezell v. RitholzSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
- State ex rel. Loser v. National Optical Stores Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1949
- Ritholz v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1945
- Ritholz v. Arkansas State Board of OptometrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Board of OptometryMississippi Supreme Court · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Darby v. Mississippi State Board of Bar AdmissionsMississippi Supreme Court · 1966
- Conway v. Mississippi State Board of HealthMississippi Supreme Court · 1965
- Capitol Optical Co. v. State Board of OptometryMississippi Supreme Court · 1954