Legal Opinion
Ezell v. Ritholz
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided August 20, 1938No. 14742PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. R. D. Ride, Acting Associate Justice.
In the year 1917 the GeneVal Assembly enacted a law regulating the practice of optometry, and this Act with subsequent amendments was incorporated in the Code of 1932, Sections 5232 to 5250, both' inclusive. And some further amendments were made in the year 1932. This law provides for the appointment of a Board of Examiners, and it is further required that every person before beginning to practice optometry shall pass an examination before the Board “in theoretic, practical and physiological optics, theoretic…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- In Re DebsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Butchers' Union Slaughter-House & Live-Stock Landing Co. v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Seifert v. Buhl Optical Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
- State v. Kindy Optical Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1933
- Dworken v. Apartment House Owners Ass'nOhio Court of Appeals · 1931
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Baird v. Charleston CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Sloan v. South Carolina Board of Physical Therapy ExaminersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- Kee v. BaberTexas Supreme Court · 1957
- State ex rel. Loser v. National Optical Stores Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1949
- State v. BorenWashington Supreme Court · 1950
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.