Legal Opinion

Capitol Optical Co. v. State Board of Optometry

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1954No. 38794PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.

There is no substantial difference between the-facts and controlling principles in this case and those in Busch Jewelry Co. et al. v. State Board of Optometry, 216 Miss. 175, 62 So. 2d 770, Certiorari Denied by U. S. Supreme Court, October 12, 1953, 98 L. Ed. Advance-Reports No. 1, page 15.

Capitol Optical Company is a partnership firm composed of Tony Sward, R. M. Gardiner, and John May-field. These partners are engaged in business in *38Chicago, Illinois, as a partnership under the trade name of M. G. S. Optical Service. Under that trade name they employed Dr. J. J. Saveli, a licensed physician…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Board of OptometryMississippi Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Busch Jewelry Co. v. State Board of OptometryMississippi Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Womack v. Peoples Water Service Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wyoming State Board of Examiners of Optometry v. Pearle Vision Center, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Wyoming State Board of Examiners of Optometry v. Pearle Vision Center, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API