Legal Opinion

Alston v. Goodwin

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 24, 1959No. Civ. 23484PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.

The present action was commenced in Los Angeles County June 8, 1949, for the recovery of $34,634.70, being treble the amount of interest and a usurious bonus paid by plaintiffs to H. T. Goodwin in repayment of a loan. March 8,1948, Goodwin loaned plaintiffs $40,000 and took as security a crop mortgage of Alston and wife and an assignment by M. A. Fleming, Josie Bell Fleming and James M. Fleming of a note of the Alstons in the amount of $50,000 secured by a trust deed upon real property in Riverside County. Thereafter and prior to September 11, 1948, plaintiffs paid to Goodwin $51,544.90 of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wulfjen v. DoltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Jones v. MortimerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Stock v. MeekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Westman v. DyeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Taylor v. BuddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Panakosta Partners v. Hammer Lane ManagementCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. Spurgeon v. BuchterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API