Legal Opinion
Neylon v. Liberty Nat. Bank of Pawhuska
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 20, 1927No. 17533PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MASON, V. C. J.
The Liberty National Bank of Pawhuska, as plaintiff, brought suit against J. A. Neylon, as defendant, to recover the sum of $471.80, with interest and attorney fees, upon a promissory note. The defendant filed answer in which he admitted the execution of the note, but alleged that he was not liable thereon, be cause it was .executed without consideration and for the accommodation of the plaintiff, and for the further reason that the cashier of plaintiff bank had agreed that the defendant was not to be held liable thereon. For cross-petition, he alleged that the plaintiff had…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- German American State Bank v. WatsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
- Elling v. Bank of JeffersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Oilton State Bank v. RossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Doxy v. Exchange Bank of PerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- Thom v. KibbeeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Haffner v. First Nat. Bank of SeilingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- American Nat. Bank v. DunnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Bartels v. SuterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Hogue v. McClain County Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Shaw v. McShaneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.