Legal Opinion

Bartels v. Suter

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 6, 1928No. 17808PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEACH, C.

This action was instituted in the district court of Texas county by A. H. Suter, defendant in error here, as plaintiff; against Henry Bartels, plaintiff in error here, to recover judgment on two promissory notes executed by the defendant, Bartels, in favor of the Texas County National Bank.

One note was for the sum of $3,000 dated April 2, 1923, due six months thereafter, and the other was for $375 dated July 25, 1923, due in 90 days.

The notes sued upon were transferred, after maturity, and without recourse, by the payee bank to E. T. Guymon, and thereafter transferred, without…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank v. BoxleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  2. Marling v. JonesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Mersick v. AldermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
  4. Barnes v. Universal Tire Protector Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. Cottrell v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1893

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pacific-Southwest Trust & Savings Bank v. Valley Finance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Burke v. Tarrant Inv. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  3. First Nat. Bank v. Golden Glow Ref. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. Central National Bank of Alva v. BakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Pacific-Southwest Trust & Savings Bank v. Valley Finance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API