Legal Opinion
Oilton State Bank v. Ross
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 27, 1925No. 13377PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNicholson, J.
This action was instituted by the Oilton State Bank, as plaintiff, against B. B. Ross and Terry Marlin, as defendants, to recover the sum of $2,500, with interest and attorneys’ fee, upon a promissory note made, Executed, and delivered by B. B. Ross to the First National Bank of Oilton, payment ¡of 'vihieh wias guaranteed by the defendant Terry Marlin by an instrument in writing reading as follows:
“Oilton, Oklahoma,
“March 11, 1919.
“First National Bank,
“Oilton, Okla.
“Gentlemen: I will guarantee payment on the note which I ask you to carry signed by B. B. Ross. I prefer not to indorse note, but…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State Bank of Moore v. ForsythMontana Supreme Court · 1910
- Mounts v. Boardman Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Jesse French Piano & Organ Co. v. BodovitzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Rice v. RiceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
- Elson v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Roberts v. BoydstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Lindsay State Bank v. ForbisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Allan v. TerrellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Neylon v. Liberty Nat. Bank of PawhuskaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Autry v. First Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.