Legal Opinion

State ex rel. DeZarn v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1996No. 1994-1232PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 74 Ohio St.3d 461.] THE STATE EX REL. DEZARN, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. DeZarn v. Indus. Comm.,

1996-Ohio-143.] Workers’ compensation—Application for permanent total disability compensation—Compensation denied when Industrial Commission determines claimant’s age, not injury, was the overwhelming impediment to a return to work—Commission’s denial of compensation not an abuse of discretion when supported by “some evidence.” (No. 94-1232—Submitted December 5, 1995—Decided February 7,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Noll v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State ex rel. Gay v. MihmOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State Ex Rel. Speelman v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. State ex rel. DeZarn v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State ex rel. Sebestyen v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Moss v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Chapman v. Indus. Comm., 07ap-1070 (9-18-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. State ex rel. Draganic v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API