Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Draganic v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1996No. 94-2403PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Per curiam

Two questions are presented: (1) Was the commission bound by its deputy’s determination that claimant was permanently and totally disabled? (2) If not, is permanent total disability compensation nevertheless compelled by Gayt For the reasons to follow, we answer both questions in the negative.

The jurisdictional question posed by the appellate court’s decision arose out of now repealed commission resolution R89-1-009, which read:

“(A)(3) * * * [T]he issues of temporary total and permanent total disability shall be scheduled for hearing on a special hearing docket. A staff hearing officer of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pass v. C.S.T. Extraction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State ex rel. DeZarn v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State ex rel. Bryant v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State ex rel. Brewer v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Toth v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State ex rel. Tapp v. Parsec, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State ex rel. Toth v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State ex rel. Hall v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State ex rel. Go-Jo Industries v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1998

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API