State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
This appeal presents two issues for our consideration. The first issue is whether the commission’s order denying appellee’s claim for permanent total disability compensation satisfies the requirements of Noll, supra. The second issue is whether the court of appeals abused its discretion by ordering the commission to enter a finding that appellee is permanently and totally disabled. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals in all respects.
At the outset it should be noted that some of the verbiage found in our recitation of the facts and in various documents…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State ex rel. Stephenson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- State ex rel. Mitchell v. Robbins & Myers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
- State ex rel. Waddle v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- State ex rel. Lawrence v. American Lubricants Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- State ex rel. Cox v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by334 opinions
- State ex rel. Pass v. C.S.T. Extraction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel Pipoly v. State Teachers Retirement Sys.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
- State ex rel. Domjancic v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Lopez v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Jackson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
329 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.