Legal Opinion

Sorensen v. Coddington

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 20, 1926No. Docket No. 5642PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

Three motions are presented herein for determination, each arising out of an appeal taken by C. Martin from an order denying his motion to set aside an execution sale of personal property which had been seized by the sheriff while in the possession of Martin as lessee thereof and sold to the firm of Feigenberg Bros, and one Bercovich, pursuant to a writ of execution issued in an action brought by E. Sorensen against C. H. Coddington, Martin’s lessor. The purchasers at said sale and the plaintiff in the action now present separate motions for the dismissal of said appeal, and Martin has moved…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re Estate of BlytheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Turner v. MarkhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Nelson v. NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Coalition for a Sustainable Future in Yucaipa v. City of YucaipaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. Jordan v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. Leroy v. Bella Vista Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Martin v. HoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Martin v. FeigenbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API