Legal Opinion

Turner v. Markham

California Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1909No. L.A. No. 2212PublishedCited by 13 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County rendered in proceedings supplementary to execution. Curtis D. Wilbur, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

The plaintiff above named recovered a judgment in the superior court of Los Angeles County against H. H. Markham and George H. Coffin for $116,842.81 and costs. Thereafter he instituted in said court proceedings supplementary to execution and these proceedings culminated in an order requiring Markham to pay over to the judgment debtor the sum of forty-eight hundred dollars found by the court to be in his hands and under his control. Prom this order Markham appeals.

If the judgment recovered by the plaintiff were still subsisting we would be required to examine the points made by the appellant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ward v. ShermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Turner v. MarkhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. In re Estate of BlytheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Nelson v. NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Paul v. Milk Depots, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Blickenstaff v. BlickenstaffIndiana Court of Appeals · 1929
  3. Women's International League for Peace & Freedom v. City of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. Leroy v. Bella Vista Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Sorensen v. CoddingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API